WILDLIFE: 'Joe Exotic' launches lawsuit against feds from prison - E&E News

Posted: 25 Mar 2020 10:47 AM PDT

"Joe Exotic" is fighting back against the Fish and Wildlife Service, this time from behind bars.

The flamboyant former roadside zoo owner formally known as Joseph Maldonado-Passage is suing the federal agency, even as he embarks on a 22-year prison sentence following his conviction on murder-for-hire and wildlife charges extraordinary enough to captivate several filmmakers.

In a partially handwritten and at times rambling lawsuit filed March 17 from the Grady County Jail in Oklahoma, Maldonado-Passage faulted the Fish and Wildlife Service and several of its officials for "false imprisonment, false arrest, perjury, entrapment" and related alleged misdeeds.

"The FWS and its agents are clearly enforcing these laws under pressure of the animal rights groups," Maldonado-Passage declared, adding that the agency had been driven to "further a private agenda to end big cats in private collections."

The suit also ranges across a variety of alleged conspiracies and allegations that include a "crooked cop," anti-gay bias, the death of Maldonado-Passage's mother and a $100,000 reward "placed on Plaintiff's head."

Maldonado-Passage is representing himself in the lawsuit, which seeks $15 million in addition to $78.8 million for what he described as "18 years of research and care of 200 generic tigers and cross-breeds for 365 days a year for 18 years."

Last April, the 56-year-old Oklahoma native was convicted of two counts of murder for hire, eight counts of falsifying wildlife records and nine counts of violating the Endangered Species Act. He is appealing; in the meantime, a federal judge sentenced him in January (E&E News PM, Jan. 22).

Maldonado-Passage served as entertainment director and owner of the Greater Wynnewood Exotic Animal Park in Wynnewood, Okla.

"The zoo grew into one of the largest private zoos in the United States, housing over 200 Tigers and nearly 400 other exotic animals at one time over the next 18 years," Maldonado-Passage's lawsuit states.

He once ran as a Libertarian in the Oklahoma gubernatorial primary, finishing third, and further embellished his reputation with a "Joe Exotic TV" podcast that emphasized the outrageous.

Court filings show that FWS agents began investigating Maldonado-Passage for possible violations of the Endangered Species Act and the Lacey Act beginning in 2015. His operation also drew complaints from Florida resident Carole Baskin's Big Cat Rescue.

Prosecutors say Maldonado-Passage's rage at Baskin eventually turned into a murder-for-hire scheme in which one supposed hit man never fulfilled the contract and another turned out to be an undercover FBI special agent (Greenwire, March 29, 2019).

"The case agent's grand jury testimony suggests law enforcement became aware of threats toward [Baskin] as early as late 2016," a Dec. 5, 2018, court filing stated. "Further investigation revealed Mr. Maldonado-Passage's numerous posts on social media and internet videos wishing harm to come to [Baskin]."

The Joe Exotic yarn inspired a six-part podcast and is now the subject of the critically acclaimed Netflix documentary series "Tiger King: Murder, Mayhem and Madness."

Will China's Wildlife-Consumption Ban Work? | by Federico Varese & Rebecca W.Y. Wong - Project Syndicate

Posted: 25 Mar 2020 06:58 AM PDT

OXFORD – Since the outbreak of COVID-19, which is widely suspected to have emerged from Wuhan's Huanan Market in December 2019, public-health and animal-rights advocates have been calling for more scrutiny of "wet markets," where a wide range of live animals are kept in close contact with one another and with people, slaughtered on the spot, and sold. These markets are ripe for the cross-species transmission of novel pathogens, and they exist across Asia, where they support other industries, from restaurants and tourism to traditional medicines.

Insuring the Survival of Post-Pandemic Economies
Getty Images

1
This Time Truly Is Different
Johannes Eisele/AFP via Getty Images

Carmen M. Reinhart notes that even the 1918-19 influenza pandemic offers no guidance about the likely economic impact of COVID-19.

3
The COVID Wake-Up Call

Robert Muggah presents the data to show that the coronavirus pandemic should not have come as a surprise.

0

We have both had a glimpse of the wildlife trade in China. In 2016, while conducting interviews for research on underground banking in several Chinese towns near the border with Macau and Hong Kong, we met an informal banker who offered us more than just money-laundering services. "I could easily arrange for you to eat a monkey tonight," she boasted, before giving us the address of a family-run restaurant on the outskirts of Zhuhai.

We declined the offer of ye wei (wild animal), but we decided to visit the establishment anyway. Traveling for about an hour from downtown Zhuhai, we soon discovered that restaurants illegally serving wild animals were common once one entered the more discreet locations beyond the city centers. Most of the animals, we learned, were sourced from local poachers or from wet markets like the one in Wuhan.

As part of its response to the COVID-19 epidemic, the National People's Congress of China in late February issued a permanent ban on the trade and consumption of non-aquatic wild animals. And yet, although China already had protections for endangered yellow-breasted buntings, these were among the 10,000 birds recovered by police in a barn outside Beijing last September. They were awaiting shipment to restaurants in southern China, where they would be offered as high-price menu options.

The question, then, is whether the new, broader ban will work. The Chinese government is absolutely correct to ban the trade of live wild animals, as these are known to transmit novel diseases to humans. The COVID-19 coronavirus will probably turn out to have originated in a bat (or, possibly, a smuggled pangolin), and the 2002-03 outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome seems to have started when another coronavirus (SARS-CoV) made the leap from a civet cat to a human.

To some, a complete ban on consumption of wild land animals may seem draconian in a country where the practice has deep cultural roots. But a ban is, in fact, well aligned with current Chinese social norms. Contrary to a widespread perception in the West, several recent surveys show that most Chinese do not consume wild animals, and actually frown upon the practice. Especially among younger generations, there is a growing concern for animal welfare across China.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

Subscribe today and get unlimited access to OnPoint, the Big Picture, the PS archive of more than 14,000 commentaries, and our annual magazine, for less than $2 a week.

Still, there is a risk that the new law will create a false sense of accomplishment, undermining further efforts to end the trafficking of wild animals. After all, a 2015 ban on the sale of live poultry in Guangzhou had only a limited effect. Similarly, despite domestic laws that have been on the books for years, the sale and consumption of endangered species continues. In December 2019, Chinese customs authorities in Zhejiang province seized more than 10,000 kilograms of pangolin scales, and discovered that the same criminal group had smuggled in some 12,500 kilograms of scales the previous year.

Although consumption of wild animals appeals to only a small minority of people, poachers wouldn't run the risk of importing and distributing them if there were no demand for them. Much of that demand comes from the traditional-medicine trade. On another of our research trips – this time to Yunnan province in southwest China – we interviewed the manager of a Chinese medicine store who proudly informed us that he was offering tiger-penis soup, a delicacy billed as a male sexual-performance enhancer. Other prevalent superstitions in China include the belief that eating exotic fish will make you a better swimmer, and that owl meat can improve your eyesight.

As one of us (Wong) details in a 2019 book, the criminal networks that cater to these tastes stretch across international borders and many provinces within China. Their illegal wildlife procurement and trafficking have proven to be both lucrative and low-risk, owing to a lack of enforcement.

But the COVID-19 pandemic has given the Chinese government an opportunity to effect real change on this issue. It should use the global outcry over wet markets and the wild-animal trade to make animal welfare a top policy priority. And it must step up enforcement on the ground, especially in the trade of endangered species. As we have seen, legal bans are only as effective as the mechanisms in place to uphold them.

Fortunately, most Chinese support bans on wild-animal consumption. To ensure that the rest of society gets on board, social influencers and state media should be deployed to dispel the falsehoods and superstitions associated with wildlife consumption. Such myths may not be widely believed, but they influence enough people to drive demand and create the conditions for a global disaster.

Search This Blog

Acuarium